500 mm 150 200 LPR Milling Lead angle 0°/ 2° MSRS90 Cutting conditions (Shouldering) In case of MSRS90100R-1-6T Workpiece material Overhang lengthLPR(mm) Cutting conditionsCutting speed Vc (m/min)Feed fz (mm/t) (ap × ae) Chip evacuation rate(cc/min) Overhang length LPR(mm) Less than 120mm 180 0.2 15 × 80 826 Cast iron 120~200mm 180 0.2 15 × 40 413 201mm and over 230 0.1 15 × 40 263 Less than 120mm 150 0.2 15 × 80 689 Carbon steel 120~200mm 150 0.2 15 × 40 344 201mm and over 200 0.1 15 × 40 229 In case of MSRS90100R-2-6T Workpiece material Overhang lengthLPR(mm) Cutting conditionsCutting speed Vc (m/min)Feed fz (mm/t) (ap × ae) Chip evacuation rate(cc/min) Less than 120mm 180 0.2 30 × 50 1,032 Cast iron 120~200mm 180 0.2 30 × 30 619 201mm and over 230 0.1 30 × 25 329 Less than 120mm 150 0.2 30 × 50 861 Carbon steel 120~200mm 150 0.2 30 × 30 517 201mm and over 200 0.1 30 × 25 287 In case of MSRS90100R-4-6T Workpiece material Overhang lengthLPR(mm) Cutting conditionsCutting speed Vc (m/min)Feed fz (mm/t) (ap × ae) Chip evacuation rate(cc/min) Less than 140mm 180 0.2 60 × 20 826 Cast iron 140~200mm 180 0.2 60 × 10 413 201mm and over 230 0.1 60 × 10 263 Less than 140mm 150 0.2 60 × 20 689 Carbon steel 140~200mm 150 0.2 60 × 10 344 201mm and over 200 0.1 60 × 10 229 Case studies FCD450 SCM420 M Industrial parts Construction machine part • Vc=150m/min • Vc=200m/min • ap x ae=6 x 65mm • ap x ae=10 x 50mm • fz=0.15mm/t • fz=0.1mm/t (Vf=430mm/min) (Vf=400mm/min) MSRS90100R-1-6T(ø100 ·6 flutes)SPMT180616EN-NB3/NB4MMaacchhiinneeddppoortritoionn MSRS90125R-1-8T(ø125 ·8 flutes)SPMT180616EN-NB3/NB4 (PR1210) (PR1230) MSRS90(PR1210) Chip evacuation rate = 258cc/min MSRS90(PR1230) Chip evacuation rate = 200cc/min Competitor B 107cc/min Competitor C 153cc/min • MSRS90 more than doubled the machining efficiency compared with competitor B. • MSRS90 improved the machining efficiency to 1.3 times that of competitor C. • Competitor B machined with 2 passes (ap x ae=3 x 65mm). • Competitor C machined with ap x ae=5 x 50mm MSRS90 machined with only 1 pass. • Tool cost is reduced to 1/3 although competitor C is expensive using 2-corner insert. • Cutting time was reduced. (User evaluation) MSRS90 reduced machining cost as well as improved machining efficiency. (User evaluation) Mold steel Alloy steel Shipbuilding parts Power generation parts • Vc=150m/min 2,000mm • Vc=160m/min • ap x ae=10 x 10~50mm• fz=0.1mm/t MMacphaoincrehtdiinopoenrdtion 50 • ap x ae=10 x 0~20mm• fz=0.15mm/t (Vf=240mm/min) (Vf=500mm/min) 740 MSRS90160R-1-8T(ø160 ·8 flutes) MSRS90125R-1-8T(ø125 ·8 flutes) SPMT180616EN-NB3/NB4 SPMT180616EN-NB3/NB4 (PR1230) (PR1230) φ800 MSRS90(PR1230) Chip evacuation rate = 120cc/min MSRS90(PR1230) 12 surfaces/edge Competitor D 60cc/min Competitor E 8 surfaces/edge • MSRS90 more than doubled the machining efficiency compared with competitor D. • MSRS90 showed 1.5 times longer tool life than that of competitor E. • Competitor D machined with ap x ae=5 x 10~50mm • Competitor E machined with 2 passes on a side (ap x ae=12 x 0 to 10mm). ➮ Low cutting force of MSRS90 enabled twice as large ap as that of competitor. • Competitor E was poor in feed rate (Vf=400mm/min). ➮ Machining efficiency was • It can double the ap as well as increase the cutting speed (Vc=100 ➮150). improved by MSRS90 (by achieving reduction in cutting time). ➮ Machining efficiency was improved by MSRS90 (by achieving reduction in cutting time). (User evaluation) • Although competitor E is load due to high cutting force. MSRS90 operates fairly quietly. (User evaluation) M111