Lead angle 0°/ 2° MEW Double-sided 4-edge insert MEW Kyocera's unique mold technology reduces cutting A.R.force equivalent to positive inserts Max .+10° (LOMU 15 type) A.R. Max .+10° (LOMU 15 type) Obtuse edge increases Obtuse edge increases Obtuse ed Cutting edge cutting edge toughness Cutting edge cutting edge toughness angle 90˚ angle 90˚ Cutting edge cutting ed angle 90˚ 90° 90° 90° Cutting edge Cutting edge Obtuse edge ue mold technology Unique mold technology ositive inserts Low cutting force equivalent to positive inserts Obtuse edge Unique mold technology Fracture resistance comparison (Internal evaluation) nd the feed force. High stability at high feed rates Cutting force comparison (Internal evaluation) Fracture resistance co * Cutting force is the resultant force of the principal force and the feed force. MEW ositive inserts Low cutting force equivalent to positive inserts GM chipbreaker Available for further machining 2,000 1,800 MEW GM chipbreaker Cutting force (N ) Equivalent to positive inserts Cutting force comparisonFracture Competitor D (Internal evaluation) Fracture resistance 1,600 comparison (Internal evaluation) fz (mm/t) (Negative) * Cutting force is the resultant force of the principal force and the feed force. 1,400 High stability at high feed rates Competitor D (Negative) M 98% 0.30 1,200 Competitor E 2,000 (Negative) Fracture 0.35 MEW 1,000 127% 109% 100% 98% Available for Competitor E 1,800 GM chipbreaker (Negative) Cutting force (N ) further machining 0 10 20 30 40 50 Equivalent to positive inserts 800 Competitor C Competitor A Competitor B MEW Competitor C 0 (Positive) 1,600 Cutting time (min) (Negative) (Negative) GM chipbreaker (Positive) 1,400 Vc=120m/min apxae=3x10mm fz=0.3~0.35mm/t SCM440H (37~39HS) Cutting dia. ø20 Competitor D Fracture fz (mm/t) Vc=120m/min apxae=3x10m Vc=150m/min apxae=3x15mm fz=0.15mm/t S50C Cutting dia. ø20 (Negative) SCM440H (37~39HS) Cuttin 1,200 0.30 Milling 127% 109% 100% 98% Competitor E ing chattering1,000 MEW Competitor F Competitor G Fracture Improved surface finish, minimizing chattering 0.35 ME GM chipbreaker (Negative) (Positive) (Negative) GM chip attering and burrs 800 Sharp cutting and superior resistance to chattering and burrs al rake design +20° Competitor A +17° B Competitor MEW +17° Competitor C 0 10 20 30 40 50 with helical cutting edge and optimum axial rake design +2 (Negative) (Negative) Large actual rake angle lowers cuttingGM force chipbreaker (Positive) Cutting time (min) Large act Burr comparison with positive cutters (Internal evaluation) Vc=120m/min Surface ofapxae=3x10mm fz=0.3~0.35mm/t shoulder wall (Internal evaluation) Burr comparison with Vc=150m/min apxae=3x15mm fz=0.15mm/t S50C Cutting dia. ø20 SCM440H (37~39HS) Cutting dia. ø20 rH Competitor I Competitor H tter) MEW (Positive cutter) MEW (Positive cutter) MEW Improved surface finish, minimizing Burrs chattering MEW Competitor F Competitor G GM chipbreaker (Negative) (Positive) Sharp cutting and superior resistance to chattering and burrs with helical cutting edge and optimum axial rake design +20° +17° +17° Large actual rake angle lowers cutting force SurfaceSharp of shoulder wall cutting enables less burrs (Internal than positive cutters evaluation) Burr comparison with Smooth positive surface cutters of MEW without chattering (Internal evaluation) Sharp cutting en a. ø20 Vc=250m/min apxae=4x5mm fz=0.1mm/t Dry S50C Cutting dia. ø20 Vc=240m/min apxae= 4 (3passes) x5mm fz=0.12mm/t Dry SS400 Cutting dia. ø20 Vc=250m/min apxae=4x5mm fz=0.1 Competitor H Competitor I MEW (Positive cutter) MEW (Positive cutter) Burrs Smooth surface of MEW without chattering Sharp cutting enables less burrs than positive cutters Vc=240m/min apxae= 4 (3passes) x5mm fz=0.12mm/t Dry SS400 Cutting dia. ø20 Vc=250m/min apxae=4x5mm fz=0.1mm/t Dry S50C Cutting dia. ø20 M36